Dr. Eric Westman Debates T. Colin Campbell

You know T. Colin Campbell from his famous China Study (or perhaps you know him because of Denise Minger’s excoriating analysis of it). And of course, Eric Westman needs no introductions in these quarters… So it was with great anticipation that I’ve waited for the chance to watch their debate.

I have an obvious bias, so I’ll keep my interpretation short: T. Colin Campbell’s reliance on FUD (fear, uncertainty, and doubt) was infuriating at points, but Westman was calm and self possessed and IMO, he argued his case better than his opponent.

Atkins vs. China Study diet. Who won? You decide. from uabnews on Vimeo.

*Resources*

Preview of Peter Attia’s TEDMED 2013 Talk

Peter Attia’s TEDMED 2013 talk has been given some great reviews, but we’re going to take some time before it’s available on video. Until then, we have a teaser video that covers his own prejudism against the overweight and obese as a young(er) doctor. He tended to blame his overweight patients for their weight related diseases, and he remarks how fundamentally different this was to how he treated his other patients.

At any rate, here’s a couple minute of what looks to be a very engaging talk. Let’s see if it tides us over…

Resources

Gary Taubes On The Science of Obesity In The British Medical Journal

Today a new article by Gary Taubes was published in the British Medical Journal. It’s entitled, “The science of obesity: what do we really know about what makes us fat?“, and it’s a good one.

Those of us who have read Why We Get Fat or Good Calories, Bad Calories will find much that is familiar here, but I appreciate Taubes’ frequent reminder that our notions of the drivers of obesity may be tragically flawed.

the energy balance notion has an obvious flaw: it is tautological. If we get fatter (more massive), we have to take in more calories than we expend—that’s what the laws of thermodynamics dictate—and so we must be overeating during this fattening process. But this tells us nothing about cause. Here’s the circular logic:

Why do we get fat? Because we overeat.

How do we know we’re overeating? Because we’re getting fatter.

And why are we getting fatter? Because we’re overeating.

And so it goes, round and round.

“The statement that primary increase of appetite may be a cause of obesity does not lead us very far,” wrote the Northwestern University School of Medicine endocrinologist Hugo Rony in 1940 in Obesity and Leanness, “unless it is supplemented with some information concerning the origin of the primarily increased appetite. What is wrong with the mechanism that normally adjusts appetite to caloric output? What part of this mechanism is primarily disturbed?” Any regulatory defect that drove people to gain weight, Rony noted, would induce them to take in more calories than they expend. “Positive caloric balance would be, then, a result rather than a cause of the condition.”

Having introduced the familiar tautology behind many explanations of obesity, Taubes returns to familiar territory by examining the history of competing theories of obesity, ending in the current epoch with a castigation of the observational studies that overstep their bounds by assuming correlation equals causation.

The problems with observational studies are manyfold, and no doubt are familiar to many in the community. Taubes doesn’t stop there though. He continues with a look at the sad state of experimental trials and the need for better research and science. Finally, he concludes:

Finally, if the best we’ve done so far isn’t good enough—if uncontrolled experiments and observational studies are unreliable, which should be undeniable—then we have to find the willingness and the resources to do better. With the burden of obesity now estimated at greater than $150bn (£100bn; €118bn) a year in the US alone, virtually any amount of money spent on getting nutrition research right can be defended on the basis that the long term savings to the healthcare system and to the health of individuals will offset the costs of the research by orders of magnitude.

And it’s true. And this speaks directly to PaleofastUK’s concerns from yesterday. We can’t accept shoddy science and subpar research, regardless of where it’s performed. We can’t go into this attempting to prove what we already believe is true. Let the science guide the way, and take us where it may.

Resources

NuSi Awarded $40-Million In Research Funding

The Arnold Foundation, which previously granted NuSi $5-million in seed money, has donated an additional $40-million to conduct three experiments examining the relationship between nutrition and disease. According to a press release not (yet?) available on the NuSi site, these experiments will be run across six universities/research institutions over the next three years.

Can’t wait to read about the study designs here…

Resources

Musings On Sugar Consumption and Fruity Pebbles

Yesterday I posted a video from a Robert Lustig presentation where a woman who claimed to be a former brand manager for Fruity Pebbles spoke, in tears, about how parents in the focus groups she attended felt good about feeding their children Fruity Pebbles because they liked the idea of giving their kids fruit in the morning.

It’s a telling moment. If you haven’t watched it yet, please do so.

In that post I also listed the basic nutrition information for a serving of Fruity Pebbles compared to a serving of a real piece of fruit: a naval orange.

This got me thinking about serving sizes of the Fruity Pebbles and wondering if they correspond to the volume of it that I would typically eat in the morning. Lets take a look…

Post lists the serving size of Fruity Pebbles as 3/4 cup (or 27 grams). Here’s what 28 grams of Fruity Pebbles looks like in a bowl. Why 28 grams? Well, the recommended serving size is 27 grams, by my food scale appears to only measure in even-numbered units, so I went with 28 grams instead of 26…

Photograph of Fruity Pebbles in a bowl on a food scale.

28 Grams of Fruity Pebbles in a bowl. Standard serving size is 27 grams (3/4 cup).

And here’s what it looks like in a measuring cup. I guess 27 grams does work out to 3/4 cup after all.

Photograph of Fruity Pebbles breakfast cereal in a 1-cup measuring cup.

28 grams of Fruity Pebbles works out to approximately 3/4 of a cup.

Based on the nutritional information for Fruity Pebbles, this constitutes 12 grams of sugar and 0 grams of fiber, leaving us with a total of 24 total grams of highly processed and refined carbohydrate out of 27 grams of Fruity Pebbles.

Now, is this the amount of Fruity Pebbles someone is likely to eat? Let’s take a look…

I found a bowl similar to the size I used growing up (forgive the chipped edges). Growing up, I never measured the amount of cereal I put in a bowl by the recommendations on the back of the box. I just filled the bowl to the “right level for cereal”, added milk, and ate. This is what a bowl looked like:

Photograph of Fruity Pebbles in a bowl on a food scale.

82 Grams of Fruity Pebbles in a bowl. Standard serving size is 27 grams (3/4 cup).

How much does this weigh? Well, it’s 82 grams… which equates to roughly 3.03 servings of Fruity Pebbles. This means a typical breakfast consisted of a bolus of 72.7 grams of highly refined carbohydrates (36.3 grams of sugar + 36.3 grams of starch), with no fiber to slow the rate of absorption. If I were particularly hungry, I might have seconds. Or add a glass of orange juice. More sugar, no fiber…

We don’t need to marvel at the fact that the American average consumption of sugar is astronomically high and rising… The USDA Fact Book shows that in 1950 we ate 109.6lbs of “caloric sweeteners” (cane sugar, beet sugar, corn syrup, etc…) per year. In 2000, that number had risen to 152.4lbs. Remember, these are sweeteners…things added to food to make them more palatable. That’s in addition to the sugars already in the foods we eat.

Table showing American consumption of sweeteners from 1950 to 2000

The USDA Factbook estimates American consumption of sweeteners from 1950-2000.

152.4 lbs. Seem like a lot? Consider this… If you ate a recommended serving size (27 grams or 3/4 cup) of Fruity Pebbles every day for a year, you’d be consuming 9.6 pounds of sugar. And if you ate something approaching a bowl full (82g) of Fruity Pebbles a day for a year, you’d be approaching 29.2 pounds of sugar a year. In Fruity Pebbles alone.

On top of that, add fruit juices (because they are healthy, right?), sodas, cakes, candies, etc… and it starts to seem like a miracle that the average is only 152.4 lbs a year and not two or three times that. One top of that, think of your pastas and breads (refined carbs like flour are no different than refined sugars in your body…it’s all serum glucose) and it becomes clear that we’re eating a hell of a lot of stuff that turns into glucose in the blood.

Coincidentally, we also know that we’re seeing a dramatic increase in Americans suffering from Type 2 diabetes. What causes this? Overconsumption of carbohydrates leads to insulin resistance. This leads the pancreas to work harder and harder to produce ever-increasing amounts of insulin until, eventually, the pancreas’ beta cells burn out and can’t produce insulin anymore. Without insulin, blood sugar will increase and you’ll die. So, to keep this in check, you’ll need to inject insulin. And of course, if you don’t change your diet, you’ll need to inject greater and greater volumes of insulin to counteract your continuing insulin resistance.

And what of all this insulin? Well we know that insulin is tumogenic, obesagenic, and leads to a host of health problems on its own.

It looks like it all starts with what you put in your mouth. Crap like Fruity Pebbles may have the word “fruit” in it’s name, but there’s no fruit in it. It may be vitamin fortified, but it’s far from healthy. Think about this the next time you walk down the cereal aisle at the supermarket…or open your cupboard looking for something to eat for breakfast.

Resources

Gallery of Fruity Pebbles

Former Brand Manager for Kraft Breaks Down In Tears At Lustig Presentation

There’s no doubt that Robert Lustig has a powerful (though not new) message, and he’s gaining an increasingly broad audience for his message. More and more people are making the connection between excess sugar (carbohydrate) consumption and obesity, disease and ill health.

Still, what happens at this event is striking. Lustig takes a question from a woman who claims to be a former brand manager for Kraft1 who worked on Fruity Pebbles cereal. She breaks down in tears as she confesses to sitting in focus groups and hearing parents of children report that they feed their kids Fruity Pebbles in the morning because they feel good about giving their children fruit first thing in the morning.

Ahhh, marketing…

It’s powerful stuff, and you should watch it.

After you watch her disclosure and Lustig’s response (starts at the 7 minute mark), then go back to the beginning and watch the whole thing.

In case you’re wondering what moved this woman to tears, let’s take a look at the nutritional information and ingredients of Fruity Pebbles. Just for fun, we’ll compare that next to a real piece of fruit:

Fruity Pebbles An Orange (Naval)
Serving Size 27g (3/4 cup) 140g (1 orange)
Calories 108 69
Total Fat 1g 0
-Saturated Fat 0g 0g
-Trans Fat 0g 0g
Cholesterol 0mg 0mg
Sodium 158mg 1mg
Total Carbohydrate 24g 18g
-Dietary Fiber 0g 3g
-Sugars 12g 12g

Which would you rather feed your child? If you feel the slightest ambivalence, check out the difference in serving sizes. Now look at what happens when we normalize the serving size for each to 100 grams.

Fruity Pebbles An Orange (Naval)
Serving Size 100g
(~ 3.7 3/4 cup servings)
100g
(70% of an orange)
Calories 401 49
Total Fat 4g 0g
-Saturated Fat 1g 0g
-Trans Fat 0g 0g
Cholesterol 0mg 0mg
Sodium 584mg 1mg
Total Carbohydrate 88g 13g
-Dietary Fiber 1g 2g
-Sugars 44g 8g

Resources

More Research On Fish Oil

This is just going to be a quickie, but I need to get to it before I lose it: New research out of the Harvard School of Public Health finds that,

Older adults who have higher blood levels of omega-3 fatty acids—found almost exclusively in fatty fish and seafood—may be able to lower their overall mortality risk by as much as 27% and their mortality risk from heart disease by about 35%, according to a new study from Harvard School of Public Health (HSPH) and the University of Washington. (HSPH News)

To be honest, I’m kind of glad to see this. In some of the communities I frequent, there appears to be a backlash against supplementing with fish oil. Sometimes people point to this paper as justification: Long-term intake of fish oil increases oxidative stress and decreases lifespan in senescence-accelerated mice. (Yeah, I know…mouse studies…). Because of this, the new research is a welcomed resource to point to and consider when thinking about supplementation. (I’ll ignore the question of countering a mouse study with an observational study for now… :P )

At any rate, the new research is hidden behind a paywall. So you’ll have to get it on your own. For now, however, I’ll leave you with the results from the study:

During 30 829 person-years, 1625 deaths (including 570 cardiovascular deaths), 359 fatal and 371 nonfatal CHD events, and 130 fatal and 276 nonfatal strokes occurred. After adjustment, higher plasma levels of ω3-PUFA biomarkers were associated with lower total mortality, with extreme-quintile hazard ratios of 0.83 for EPA (95% CI, 0.71 to 0.98; P for trend = 0.005), 0.77 for DPA (CI, 0.66 to 0.90; P for trend = 0.008), 0.80 for DHA (CI, 0.67 to 0.94; P for trend = 0.006), and 0.73 for total ω3-PUFAs (CI, 0.61 to 0.86; P for trend < 0.001). Lower risk was largely attributable to fewer cardiovascular than noncardiovascular deaths. Individuals in the highest quintile of phospholipid ω3-PUFA level lived an average of 2.22 more years (CI, 0.75 to 3.13 years) after age 65 years than did those in the lowest quintile.

Resources

  1. Higher blood omega-3s associated with lower risk of premature death among older adults, Harvard School of Public Health News, April 2013.
  2. Long-term intake of fish oil increases oxidative stress and decreases lifespan in senescence-accelerated mice, Tsuduki, Honma et al. Nutrition. 2011 Mar;27(3):334-7. doi: 10.1016/j.nut.2010.05.017. Epub 2010 Jul 10.
  3. Plasma Phospholipid Long-Chain ω-3 Fatty Acids and Total and Cause-Specific Mortality in Older Adults: A Cohort Study, Mozaffarian, Lemaitre et al. Annals of Internal Medicine. 2 April 2013;158(7):515-525.

New Research Posits DHA’s Protective Role In Cancer

It’s hard for me to hear about Omega-3′s (EPA and DHA) and not think of Alice and Fred Ottoboni’s work in this domain. They’ve done more to help me understand the importance of these substances than anyone else, and it’s hard to consider their book, Modern Nutritional Diseases as anything less than brilliant.

So it was with great interest that I read this article:
Fatty Acid Metabolite Shows Promise Against Cancer In Mice
. I know…I know…another rodent study. And another study touting a cancer cure. How many of these do we have to endure?

Well, probably many. There’s something about this that I find intriguing:

A team of UC Davis scientists has found that a product resulting from a metabolized omega-3 fatty acid helps combat cancer by cutting off the supply of oxygen and nutrients that fuel tumor growth and spread of the disease. [...] The metabolite is epoxy docosapentaenoic acid (EDP), an endogenous compound produced by the human body from the omega-3 fatty acid named docosahexaenoic acid (DHA), which is found in fish oil and breast milk. In animal studies, the UC Davis scientists found that EDP inhibits angiogenesis, the formation of new blood vessels in the body.
[…]
The researchers also found that a metabolite of arachidonic acid (ARA), an omega-6 fatty acid, has the opposite effect of EDP. The ARA metabolite, epoxyeicosatrienoic acids (EETs), slightly increases angiogenesis and tumor progression in mice.

That we should seek out ways to ensure our diets are high in Omega-3′s and low in Omega-6′s won’t be news to most of us. There are many potential health benefits from doing each. However, what intrigues me about this research is that it postulates a precise mechanism by which DHA is protective against (certain types of?) cancer, and how Arachadonic Acid is tumogenic…this is the type of thing that excites me. This, at least, is something testable.

And what of the Ottobonis? And of a ketogenic diet? Well, I’m reminded of their fantastic exploration of fatty acid metabolism in Modern Nutritional Diseases (1st. Edition), where, after a fascinating review of the biochemical pathways of essential fatty acids, eicosanoids, prostaglandins and arachadonic acid (Cox-2 and lipoxygenase pathways) they write:

The tremendous importance of blood glucose in influencing what the biochemistry of the body does with major nutrients (carbohydrates, proteins, and fats) cannot be overemphasized. Blood glucose, the ultimate metabolic product of most carbohydrates, exerts this influence by prompting the pancreas to release the hormone insulin. Insulin, in turn, stimulates the enzymes that cause the sythesis of body fat and cholesterol (Figure 5-1). Insulin also stimulates the production of arachidonic acid (Figure 203), precursor of harmful eicosanoids. As such, insulin is a major contributor to diseases that range from heart disease and stroke to type-2 diabetes and cancer. (MND, 53)

It’s worth noting the date in my edition of Modern Nutritional Diseases: 2002. Chances are, Alice and Fred Ottoboni were on to this even before then.

Resources

Aspirin: A Unique Remedy

Abstract

In the course of research into the biochemistry and physiology of the endpoints of essential fatty acid metabolism known as eicosanoids, the mechanism by which aspirin exerts its analgesic effect was revealed. It is now known that aspirin does not prevent the COX enzyme from converting arachidonic acid to pain-producing proinflammatory eicosanoids as had long been assumed, but rather it modifies the COX enzyme by acetylating it thereby making it convert arachidonic acid to antiinflammatory eicosanoids. During these same research activities, hitherto unknown classes of naturally occurring, anti-inflammatory, pro-healing eicosanoids known as lipoxins, resolvins, protectins, neuroprotectins, and maresins were discovered. Aspirin was found to multiply many times the healing power of these natural lipid mediators by creating aspirin-triggered counterparts to all.

Introduction

The Nobel Prize in Physiology and Medicine was awarded to Sune Bergstrom, Bengt Samuelsson, and Sir John Vane in 1982 for “their discoveries concerning prostaglandins and related biologically active substances” (1). The Nobel Laureates at that time explained that the analgesic effect of aspirin was due to its ability to prevent conversion of arachidonic acid, a 20-carbon, 4-double bond, omega-6 essential fatty acid, to inflammatory prostaglandins by cyclooxygenase, the enzyme that has now come to be known by the general public as the COX enzyme.

Because the biochemistry of the COX enzyme had not yet been fully elucidated in 1982, it was assumed that aspirin’s effect was due to inhibition of COX’s active site. Thus, the Nobel Prize Laureates’ findings stimulated a massive research program to create a new class of drugs that would inhibit the COX enzyme and offer competitors for the nonpatentable aspirin. These new COX inhibitors were labeled Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs or NSAIDS for short. Now, several decades later many different NSAIDS have been produced. Some were rejected because they were ineffective or unsafe. Others were restricted to prescription use only, and a few turned out to be reasonably effective and safe for over-the-counter sale. Interestingly, to date, no NSAID has been shown to have a better safety record than aspirin or to be more effective for first aid treatment of cardiac events. Regular users of aspirin also have lower rates of chronic inflammatory diseases such as Alzheimer’s disease than do users of NSAIDS (2).

Aspirin is an Age-Old Remedy

The story of aspirin had beginnings with the methyl ester of salicylic acid, the principle ingredient of oil of wintergreen obtained from natural sources such as willow bark. Oil of wintergreen is a centuries-old liniment used for the aches and pains of rheumatism. However, because of its considerable toxicity, oil of wintergreen could not be taken internally. Throughout the decades, many derivatives of salicylic acid were synthesized in an effort to find a less toxic painkiller that would be acceptable for internal use. Some, including salicylic acid itself, were used internally and found to be very effective in relieving pain, but they were difficult to tolerate because of unpleasant side effects (2). In the mid-nineteenth century, the acetic acid derivative of salicylic acid was synthesized by a chemist at the German chemical company now known as Bayer. Bayer patented the process for making acetylsalicylic acid and the name they gave it (Aspirin) in 1899. In the 100+ years since aspirin was introduced to the public, it has become the most widely used medication in the world with a yearly production of 50,000 tons and consumption by Americans of about 80 million tablets per day (2). And the daily use of a “baby” aspirin was universally accepted several decades ago as a preventive remedy for cardiovascular diseases (2).

The Cyclooxygenase Enzyme

During NSAID development, it was discovered that the COX enzyme had two forms: COX-1 and COX-2, and that each form contained two active sites. Each form catalyzes the same two reactions. COX-1 and COX-2 are different in that they carry out two different functional roles (3). COX-1 is a constitutive form of the enzyme, namely a form that is always present in cells and tissues. It has been described as an enzyme that carries out routine housekeeping functions to maintain homeostasis. COX-2 is an inducible form, which means it is synthesized only when a need for it arises, such as trauma, increased levels of arachidonic acid, or inflammatory stimuli, such as cytokines (4). In normal good health when all is oing well internally, COX-2 cannot be found in tissues. COX-2 is called into action by a sudden injury or illness that requires immediate induction of pain and acute inflammation (4).

Important exceptions are that COX-2 is constitutive in brain and kidney (3) and in flowing blood (4). The motion of flowing blood induces synthesis of the COX-2 enzyme. Therefore, COX-2 is always present in arterial blood and can properly be considered constitutive in this medium.

Mechanism of Aspirin’s Effect

When acetylated by aspirin, both sites on COX-1 and one site COX-2 are blocked. The remaining site in COX-2 converts arachidonic acid to an intermediate metabolite called 15 HETE that is further metabolized to antiinflammatory, pro-healing eicosanoids termed aspirin-triggered lipoxins (4). It is important to note that the arachidonic acid that is converted to aspirin triggered lipoxins is no longer available as a substrate for inflammatory eicosanoids. This is an important difference between aspirin and NSAIDS in their interaction with the COX-2 enzyme.

NSAIDS do not eliminate arachidonic acid but merely prevent it from being metabolized by the COX enzymes to inflammatory, pain producing eicosanoids. This has positive, immediate pain-relieving effects; however, the unused arachidonic acid is diverted to the 5-lipoxygenase enzyme where it is converted to inflammatory leukotrienes that do damage elsewhere in the body. NSAIDs have the potential for adverse effects not seen with aspirin.

Arachidonic Acid

Arachidonic acid has become a center of interest in recent years because it has been found to be the major biochemical substrate for eicosanoids that are responsible for low-level, chronic inflammation. This chronic inflammation is widely accepted as the underlying cause of the growing numbers of non-infectious diseases that now plague this country (4). These diseases include cardiovascular diseases, asthma, cancer, arthritis, periodontal disease, and Alzheimer’s disease. Although arachidonic acid is an essential fatty acid found in reasonable amounts in meats, the current source of high systemic levels of arachidonic acid is dietary linoleic acid, an omega-6, 18-carbon essential fatty acid that is biochemically converted in the body to arachidonic acid. This arachidonic acid is biochemically transformed by COX-1, COX-2, and lipoxygenase-5 (LOX-5) to inflammatory eicosanoids. The source of this excess linoleic acid is the very high consumption of fats and oils derived from vegetable seeds (5).

A Constitutive COX-2 and the Human Heart

The fact that COX-2 is constitutive (always at hand) in flowing blood explains why a daily low-dose aspirin protects the heart. In the presence of aspirin COX-1 is completely blocked so that it can no longer convert arachidonic acid to thromboxane and other inflammatory eicosanoids that cause atherosclerosis. The site that remains active in the COX-2 enzyme produces protective antiinflammatory aspirin-trigged lipoxins instead of inflammatory eicosanoids (4). To quote Serhan:

This is important in vascular endothelial cells that are numerous in all blood vessels in vivo; under physiological flow conditions, COX-2 is constitutively expressed, which can release substantial amounts of 15 HETE when aspirin is given to healthy volunteers (4).

More Good News

As important as aspirin is in its fundamental role in modifying the COX enzymes, perhaps of even greater consequence for the health and well being of present and future generations are the more recent discoveries of the hitherto unsuspected role of aspirin in resolution (the healing process) and the unanticipated existence of whole new classes of aspirin-triggered anti-inflammatory eicosanoids that have been revealed as a result of the research into the biochemistry of aspirin and its mechanism of action (6).

Beginning in 2005, Charles Serhan and colleagues published a series of research reports that opened a door to a family of eicosanoids, termed lipid mediators that managed the healing processes (4). They stopped inflammation, swelling and pain, removed debris, initiated healing, and returned the affected area to homeostasis. Serhan and colleagues showed that this healing process was managed and carried out by pro-resolving biochemicals termed lipoxins, resolvins, protectins, neuroprotectins, and maresins that are naturally biosynthesized in the body. The body, given a healthful diet is fully capable of healing itself. Aspirin plays a major role in these healing processes by creating aspirin-triggered counterparts to all of hese pro-resolving, pro-healing natural lipid mediators. Aspirin is unique in that it significantly multiplies the power of the body’s natural healing processes (7; 8). Past studies have shown that regular use of aspirin reduces the risk of Alzheimer’s disease, heart disease, stroke, and gastric, colorectal, and breast cancers. A recently completed study found that Aspirin reduced the risk of melanoma, a deadly form of skin cancer., by up to 50%. In the same study, NSAIDs (Ibuprofen, etc) and acetaminophen (Tylenol) failed to reduce melanoma risk (9).

Editorial Commentary

The following is an editorial comment on the above melanoma study. It appeared in the same edition of the journal, Cancer, to warn readers of the dangers and ineffectiveness of aspirin. Aspirin is not recommended to prevent cancer. Despite this study and others like it, there are several reasons why aspirin is not the best defense against melanoma or other cancer, and may be harmful for some people.

Eric Jacobs, PhD, American Cancer Society strategic director of pharmacoepidemiology, said,

It is important to remember that aspirin is a real drug with real side effects, including sometimes causing serious, even occasionally fatal, stomach bleeding, even at low doses. Aspirin use is for heart disease prevention for most people who have had a heart attack, and has some benefits for cancer as well. However, at this point the American Cancer Society does not recommend that people use aspirin specifically to prevent cancer. People who are wondering if they should be using aspirin should talk to their health care provider who knows their personal medical history and can help weigh their individual risks and benefits.

According to Jacobs, the overall evidence that aspirin helps lower risk of melanoma is mixed. Jacobs said,

While some previous studies have suggested that aspirin might be linked to lower risk of melanoma, other studies, similar in size and design to this one, have not found any link.

Prevention and early detection of melanoma

The best way to lower your risk of melanoma is to protect yourself from ultraviolet (UV) radiation emitted by the sun and indoor tanning booths, lamps, and sunbeds. It’s also important to know your skin, and tell your doctor about any skin changes or growths that are new or look different. Jacobs said,

Results of this study definitely does not mean that you can safely use a tanning booth or throw away your sunscreen if you are using aspirin. Whether or not you use aspirin, you can lower your risk of developing melanoma by limiting your time in direct sun, and using protective clothing and sunscreen.

References

  1. Serhan CN. The Allergy Archives: The discovery and characterization of the leucotrienes. Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology. October 2006: 972-976.
  2. Metcalf E. Aspirin: The Miracle Drug. New York, NY: Avery: a member of the Penguin Group, 2005.
  3. Eicosanoids and Related Compounds – An Introduction. Eicosanoid Structures and Key Enzymes. The Lipid Library. aocs.org/ Updated November 23, 2011. Accessed January 4, 2012
  4. Serhan CN. Lipoxins and aspirin-triggered 15-epilipoxins are the first lipid mediators of endogenous anti-inflammation and resolution. Prostaglandins, Leukotrienes, and Essential Fatty Acids (2005) 141-162.
  5. Hibbeln JR, et al. Healthy intakes of n-3 and n-6 fatty acids: estimations considering worldwide diversity. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 2006; 83(suppl): 1483S-94S.
  6. Serhan CN et al. Resolution of inflammation: State of the art, definitions and terms. The FASEB Journal. 2007; 21 (2): 325-332.
  7. Bannenberg GL, Therapeutic applicability of anti-inflammatory and pro-resolving polyunsaturated fatty acid-derived lipid mediators. The Scientific World Journal (2010) 10, 676-712.
  8. Serhan CN, et al. Maresins: Novel macrophage mediators with potent antiinflammatory and Proresolving actions. The Journal of Experimental Medicine. 2009; 206(1): 15-23.
  9. Christina A. Gamba, et al. Aspirin is associated with lower melanoma risk among postmenopausal Caucasian women. Published online March 11, 2013 in CANCER, a peer-reviewed journal of the American Cancer Society.

Welcome ISS Vistors!

Noticed this while looking at the site analytics… Do they eat Keto on the International Space Station?

Photograph of Google Analytics showing traffic from the International Space Station

Google Analytics Reveals Visitors To Ketopia From The International Space Station

Yeah, I’m guessing Google is having fun with us on April 1st…. But it made me laugh, so I’m sharing…